03-12-2013, 06:17 PM
Quote:<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Rage" data-cid="286917" data-time="1363051072">I found this be comical on so many levels. 1) I wasn't even in the game for the majority of it, and 2) just how obsessed you are to say something that stupid without even checking it first.
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Caerbannog" data-cid="286915" data-time="1363012882">
Sterling took their time defeating Unhallowed. The game was 2-1 until 34:57, even with all of Rage's offense amirite. Well, something like this is to be expected from Unhallowed. With the random chances of their players showing up, they will have a decent, warmed up line-up every now and then. Or Sterling just played bad. Or one squad is much worse than they are given credit for, or the other one is much better. The spec chat doesn't really provide us with more clues either.
</blockquote>
First of all, I'd like to officially congratulate you on behalf of the 4v4 population on finding something that ends with "amirite" comical. That's a pretty good eye you got there, son. Surely your ego can handle these harsh blows. It's not like people don't think you just hang in there running away from enemies, waiting for someone to get them to 600 before you engage from 1500. At least this is what no one at all ever tells me.
Either way, it was more to the credit of Unhallowed. Or would you not agree that pretty much everyone expected Sterling to kill them faster and more decisively?
</blockquote>
I am not even talking about my team or Unhallowed. I don't care how the game played out beyond winning it. I was merely calling you out for not only libeling me out of pure obsession, but not even remotely checking facts before doing it. Not only did you say something completely false, but you singled me out while doing it. That is why its hilarious.