09-09-2014, 10:08 PM
Little frustrated with that response so excuse me for the rudeness 
.
5% yada yada. Your ass didn't even talk about why that 5% is significant, you just pointed out that it happens quite a bit over the thousands of games that've been played over the years. Yeah so what? Even in those 5% of cases we're talking about, explain to me what's going on there that's so wrong. How many of those 5% cases are you going to watch and say, yeah man this game is fucked up if we changed this or that setting the situation would've played out more correctly?? I don't care if it happens a million more times, the point is, which you obviously don't get, is that when an indirect does less than a direct, that is due to the situation. Right, i said it once, "circumstantial", bargeld said it another time, "situational". When the situation dictates that the shrap are going to bounce off some nearby walls when you're in an enclosed space and do extra damage, yes, that bomb is going to do a lot of damage. Now what's wrong with that?! Are you going to complain about the fraction of a percent of edge cases where a direct is not going to force a rep or get a kill but an indirect would?
"5% is significant when the sample size is hundreds of thousands of games over close to two decades. 5% can contain very important league games. It took you 2 days to respond and you respond by quoting others who you think are pro players, when the fact of the matter is they are middle-skilled. In the future I would hope you could think for yourself, good things can happen." <-- Seriously, does this paragraph contain anything of substance?
And I don't know why it matters whether i posted two or three days later.. i saw ur post but didn't have the energy or care enough to respond cause i figured u were trolling. "you respond by quoting others who you think are pro players" I guess i have to make my points explicitly clear cause you don't understand. Dude, their skill level isn't relevant, does it matter if they're the top 2 players or in the middle of the pack or the upper middle? I just quoted 2 other players who try to dodge shrap cause you thought no one does it. Oh and i don't think for myself? Again, i didn't quote them so i could echo what they said, u should've tried to understand rather than firing off some stupid retort.
"Alright, that's fine if you think that. But inconsistency is never good for a competitive game. If you want to keep inconsistency, you should acknowledge that "pro" league is nothing but a casual, fun-driven event. You can't pretend it is anything more than that when games can be decided by inconsistencies, and ultimately the end result of all the settings, the rules, and the map, is an environment where highly defensive play can keep the weak much more competitive than they should be." <--- Please explain where i took shit out of context. It looks like you're deriving the conclusion that pro league is casual from your opinion that there's inconsistency. Am i understanding you incorrectly? I had actually wanted you to offer some more inconsistencies since as you said yourself, everyone else is incompetent at judging things except for u!
.5% yada yada. Your ass didn't even talk about why that 5% is significant, you just pointed out that it happens quite a bit over the thousands of games that've been played over the years. Yeah so what? Even in those 5% of cases we're talking about, explain to me what's going on there that's so wrong. How many of those 5% cases are you going to watch and say, yeah man this game is fucked up if we changed this or that setting the situation would've played out more correctly?? I don't care if it happens a million more times, the point is, which you obviously don't get, is that when an indirect does less than a direct, that is due to the situation. Right, i said it once, "circumstantial", bargeld said it another time, "situational". When the situation dictates that the shrap are going to bounce off some nearby walls when you're in an enclosed space and do extra damage, yes, that bomb is going to do a lot of damage. Now what's wrong with that?! Are you going to complain about the fraction of a percent of edge cases where a direct is not going to force a rep or get a kill but an indirect would?
"5% is significant when the sample size is hundreds of thousands of games over close to two decades. 5% can contain very important league games. It took you 2 days to respond and you respond by quoting others who you think are pro players, when the fact of the matter is they are middle-skilled. In the future I would hope you could think for yourself, good things can happen." <-- Seriously, does this paragraph contain anything of substance?
And I don't know why it matters whether i posted two or three days later.. i saw ur post but didn't have the energy or care enough to respond cause i figured u were trolling. "you respond by quoting others who you think are pro players" I guess i have to make my points explicitly clear cause you don't understand. Dude, their skill level isn't relevant, does it matter if they're the top 2 players or in the middle of the pack or the upper middle? I just quoted 2 other players who try to dodge shrap cause you thought no one does it. Oh and i don't think for myself? Again, i didn't quote them so i could echo what they said, u should've tried to understand rather than firing off some stupid retort.
"Alright, that's fine if you think that. But inconsistency is never good for a competitive game. If you want to keep inconsistency, you should acknowledge that "pro" league is nothing but a casual, fun-driven event. You can't pretend it is anything more than that when games can be decided by inconsistencies, and ultimately the end result of all the settings, the rules, and the map, is an environment where highly defensive play can keep the weak much more competitive than they should be." <--- Please explain where i took shit out of context. It looks like you're deriving the conclusion that pro league is casual from your opinion that there's inconsistency. Am i understanding you incorrectly? I had actually wanted you to offer some more inconsistencies since as you said yourself, everyone else is incompetent at judging things except for u!