If those are the two main reasons, then what about allowing squads to add people who are currently *un*rostered if doing so wouldn't result in kicking anyone active? That's what Dune is hoping to do, anyway.
Thread Rating:
Roster locks: reasons why rosters should stay unlocked for much longer
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
Roster locks: reasons why rosters should stay unlocked for much longer - qwing - 06-28-2016, 03:24 PM
RE: Roster locks: reasons why rosters should stay unlocked for much longer - p.k - 06-29-2016, 05:02 AM
RE: Roster locks: reasons why rosters should stay unlocked for much longer - Caerbannog - 06-30-2016, 07:16 PM
RE: Roster locks: reasons why rosters should stay unlocked for much longer - qwing - 07-01-2016, 04:55 AM
RE: Roster locks: reasons why rosters should stay unlocked for much longer - p.k - 07-01-2016, 07:54 AM
RE: Roster locks: reasons why rosters should stay unlocked for much longer - qwing - 07-04-2016, 06:24 PM
RE: Roster locks: reasons why rosters should stay unlocked for much longer - Caerbannog - 07-04-2016, 07:52 PM
RE: Roster locks: reasons why rosters should stay unlocked for much longer - qwing - 07-05-2016, 01:27 AM
|
Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)