05-12-2015, 08:48 AM
Seismic there is a lapsed discussion on scheduling matches in front of the 4v4 Council, I have just nudged it back in front of the spritely members again. I'm not about having a stance on it, I don't have the history of experience. I'm just trying to help get it discussed. No relation to "teach the controversy"!
I see two things of particular note in Seismic's post.
1. The Council has no representation from the pool of unrostered players - Sterling can't present this argument directly to the forum because they are not playing this season ... because of the issue that they have no avenue to present ...
2. Sterling is a bolded and italicised case in point supporting the reality that people like to play with friends, accomplices and familiar faces. An argument against forcing smaller rosters is that you can't just make people go play with other people; a substantial proportion will say "then I'm not playing at all". It doesn't matter if this is wrong or right. What matters is that it is the case.
I see two things of particular note in Seismic's post.
1. The Council has no representation from the pool of unrostered players - Sterling can't present this argument directly to the forum because they are not playing this season ... because of the issue that they have no avenue to present ...
2. Sterling is a bolded and italicised case in point supporting the reality that people like to play with friends, accomplices and familiar faces. An argument against forcing smaller rosters is that you can't just make people go play with other people; a substantial proportion will say "then I'm not playing at all". It doesn't matter if this is wrong or right. What matters is that it is the case.
One of the three most dangerous people in Subspace.