08-06-2014, 09:37 AM
Quote:<div>Did you even read the thread?
Just comparing stats seems so uninformative. This isn't a triple crown type of thing where you need to lead categories. MVP should be the value of the player to the team. Granted, valuable players normally will have good stats because that's the nature of things, but stats shouldn't paint the entire picture. Furthermore, in other sports stats are static. If you hit a home run in the 9th inning of a baseball game during a blow out, it's in a losing effort maybe but the feat is still just as difficult. Kills, assists, and FR's in Subspace tend to get easier as the game draws nearer to the end. Without knowing where those kills came, let's just say that out of Legacy's 34 kills, 17 came in a 4v3 or better situation. Is that weighed differently than develop's kills if the majority of his came 4v4? Again, I have no idea how or when they were registered, I'm simply going by someone giving Legacy's K/D on this thread and using it as an example.
Also, what about things like ddpm, bomb/bullet accuracy%, or negative stats like WR, WRkt, and TK? If someone is the play maker of their team and doing 2500ddpm with 55% bomb accuracy but goes 33-17 in a season, are they more valuable to their team than someone that does 1200ddpm with 26% bomb accuracy but goes 36-9?
The bots here track so much information that only bringing up K/D/A and W/L seems to be such a waste.
</div>