Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Did Rage and 9-Volt+ abuse the rules?
#34
(12-06-2014, 04:00 AM)Surrey Wrote:  As for the situation, it's not a very hard concept. Get some refs like we used to have, I'm sure there are 5-6 active people who can take on this role without abusing it. We aren't children any more. If it's 3v1 or 4v1 and the score is like 11-4 the majority of us can tell who MAY possibly have a chance to win based on opponents and who can't possibly win. If it's 3v1 11-4 and there is 10 minutes left, lets face it, this game can just end now.  If a player is not engaging, end it, this is easy to tell. Sitting back and lobbing and then running if the enemy drives towards you is not considered engaging. Yes, it's a judgement call when people are engaging or not, but there are plenty of situations where people are "engaging" where the game can just be ended regardless.


I / (we? no one? most people?) don't WANT to end pracs based on who could or could not still win it. That would be very much a "dick move". Maybe the people who currently would fall under the "he won't turn this game" will learn to pick their spots and be eligible to play it out?
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Did Rage and 9-Volt+ abuse the rules? - Caerbannog - 12-06-2014, 04:40 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)